Learn more about the four criteria used for scoring during Peer-to-Peer Review and by the Evaluation Panel.
COMMUNITY-INFORMED(0-5)
Is the proposal informed and supported by the community in meaningful ways? Is there a plan to gather and integrate community knowledge and feedback throughout the life of the solution?
2.5
Points.
Collaborative approach that is responsive to community needs. Clear understanding of the community with a plan to align with community knowledge and engage stakeholders.
0
1
2
3
4
5
DISCONNECTED
CONNECTED
2.5
FEASIBLE(0-5)
Do team members have the capacity, relationships, experience, and understanding of current conditions within Arizona to deliver results? Do they offer practical project and financial plans?
2.5
Points.
Offers a qualified team with relevant partners needed to succeed and address challenges. Presents a realistic budget and plan with sufficient attention to detail.
0
1
2
3
4
5
IMPRACTICAL
ACHIEVABLE
2.5
COLLABORATIVE(0-5)
Is the team composed of diverse, creative, cross-sector partnerships that can help bridge a community divide? Do team members have a track record of meaningful community engagement?
2.5
Points.
Includes team members relevant to the success of the solution who have some potential to deliver results. Demonstrates meaningful community engagement.
0
1
2
3
4
5
EXCLUSIVE
INCLUSIVE
2.5
IMPACTFUL(0-5)
Will the solution drive lasting and transformational change? Does the proposal clearly identify and address a need that will make a difference for the community, and outline a plan to measure success?
2.5
Points.
Presents an appropriate solution to a serious and pressing need and shows potential for creating transformational change. Acceptable plan to measure results.
0
1
2
3
4
5
MINIMAL
GAME-CHANGING
2.5
Join us in contributing to a better Arizona for all.
When you accept, you agree to store cookies to help give you the best experience on our site. See Preferences to change preferences at any time, Read our Cookie Policy for more details.
